Sorry, that content could not be found

Error 404

We couldn't find https://www.paint.org/pfas-epa-reporting-ext/

Here's some content that might match what you're looking for, or you can perform a search.

ACA Comments on PFAS TRI Reporting

On Feb. 3, ACA submitted comments to U.S. EPA on proposed changes to PFAS reporting in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and supplier notification requirements. ACA is concerned […]

ACA Comments on EPA’s PFAS Reporting Rule IRFA

[…] Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and Updated Economic Analysis (IRFA) for the proposed rule, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances ( PFAS) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Opposition to Minnesota HF-1000

[…] HF 1000, legislation that would impose broad reporting requirements on manufacturers of all products containing PFAS sold in Minnesota; ban the sale of products containing PFAS in a variety of […]

Opposition to Minnesota SF 834

[…] legislation, SF 834, which would impose broad reporting requirements on manufacturers of all products containing PFAS sold in Minnesota; ban the sale of products containing PFAS in a variety of […]

ACA Letter to Senators on Federal PFAS Bill

ACA sent a letter to U.S. senators on a bipartisan bill addressing PFAS that aims to provide a consistent and practical definition of PFAS compounds for use by federal agencies, […]